Skip to main content

Why Law Firm Marketing Case Studies are Bullshit

Why Law Firm Marketing Case Studies Are BS

Over two decades of growing law firms, I’ve noticed a recurring issue: the case study trap. Marketing agencies love showcasing “hero stories” of exponential growth with flashy terms like “growth accelerator” and “instant client framework.” But this oversimplified approach ignores a critical reality—marketing success is highly contextual.

Law firms are unique, shaped by their market position, competition, internal alignment, and resources. Strategies that worked for Firm A won’t necessarily work for Firm B due to differences in geography, practice areas, and partner buy-in. And let’s not forget the “implementation gap” – varying skill levels, execution quality, and resource availability often make or break results.

Most case studies focus on short-term wins, creating unrealistic expectations while ignoring the 3-5 year investment horizon law firms need for sustainable growth. This leads to the “highlight reel delusion,” where firms judge themselves against someone else’s greatest hits.

The takeaway? Success lies in tailoring strategies to your firm’s unique DNA—not copying a playbook that may not fit. Start with strategy, than think execution.